There
are those in the field of learning and development who complain that training ROI
measurement is often used after the fact…not to show improvement in performance
so much as to justify the training that was delivered. Proving to executives
that there was a measurable positive return on their investment would be a good
thing. But many incorrectly claim that actual ROI is too difficult to measure.
Immature
training organizations generally only seek answer the following questions:
·
Did
participants enjoy the program?
·
Did
they learn what we wanted them to learn?
·
How
can we improve the program?
·
Did
our program deliver on our objectives in a cost-effective way?
It’s not hard to develop metrics for these questions. The challenge becomes figuring out a way to measure just how effectively the skills were adopted on the job and if the learners’ improved performance truly made a difference in business results that matter.
Based on over 800 successful training assessment and measurement projects, we know
that skill, knowledge and process adoption can be measured. Behavior- and outcome-based questions can be
used to get hard data. We also know that
high and low adoption rates can be correlated to the business metric(s) that you
want to move to measure impact.
This
targeted approach tells you:
·
Are
they are using it?
·
Is
it making a difference?
Do
not lose sight that these are the two real questions that Training Measurement
Services should be answering.
No comments:
Post a Comment